How Serious is the Measurement-Error Problem in a Popular Risk-Aversion Task? - Archive ouverte HAL Access content directly
Preprints, Working Papers, ... Year :

How Serious is the Measurement-Error Problem in a Popular Risk-Aversion Task?

(1) , (2) , (3) , (4)
1
2
3
4

Abstract

This paper uses the test/retest data from the Holt and Laury (2002) experiment to provide estimates of the measurement error in this popular risk-aversion task. Maximum likelihood estimation suggests that the variance of the measurement error is approximately equal to the variance of the number of safe choices. Simulations confirm that the coefficient on the risk measure in univariate OLS regressions is approximately half of its true value. Unlike measurement error, the discrete transformation of continuous riskaversion is not a major issue. We discuss the merits of a number of different solutions: increasing the number of observations, IV and the ORIV method developed by Gillen et al. (2019).
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
WP_1911_VRANCEANU.pdf (564.86 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

hal-02291224 , version 1 (18-09-2019)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-02291224 , version 1

Cite

Fabien Perez, Guillaume Hollard, Radu Vranceanu, Delphine Dubart. How Serious is the Measurement-Error Problem in a Popular Risk-Aversion Task?. 2019. ⟨hal-02291224⟩
167 View
1167 Download

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More