Group Gender Composition and Economic Decision-Making: Evidence from the Kallystée Business Game

Abstract : This paper analyses data collected in 2012 and 2013 at the ESSEC Business School from Kallystée, a proprietary mass-attendance business game. Company boards are simulated by teams of five students selected at random. The design manipulates the gender composition of the boards to allow for all possible gender combinations. Data show that all-men and mixed teams with four women perform significantly better than all-women teams. However, when controlling for the average tolerance to risk score of the teams, the performance advantage of all-men teams vanishes, while the team-specific economic performance of teams with four women is still positive and strong. Teams with four women take more risks than the team tolerance to risk score would predict, which suggests some form of team specific action bias or risk-shift.
Document type :
Preprints, Working Papers, ...
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [36 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal-essec.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01205913
Contributor : Michel Demoura <>
Submitted on : Monday, September 25, 2017 - 2:23:55 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, May 3, 2018 - 3:18:04 PM
Long-term archiving on : Tuesday, December 26, 2017 - 1:28:07 PM

File

WP1515_v2_2017.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : hal-01205913, version 2

Collections

Citation

Karine Lamiraud, Radu Vranceanu. Group Gender Composition and Economic Decision-Making: Evidence from the Kallystée Business Game. 2017. ⟨hal-01205913v2⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

293

Files downloads

168