. Bartling, U. Björn, and . Fischbacher, Shifting the Blame: On Delegation and Responsibility, The Review of Economic Studies, vol.79, issue.1, pp.67-87, 2012.
DOI : 10.1093/restud/rdr023

D. Besancenot, D. Dubart, and R. Vranceanu, The value of lies in an ultimatum game with imperfect information, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.93, pp.239-247, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.03.029

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00692139

G. Charness and M. Dufwenberg, Bare promises: An experiment, Economics Letters, vol.107, issue.2, pp.281-283, 2010.
DOI : 10.1016/j.econlet.2010.02.009

G. Charness and M. Dufwenberg, Promises and Partnership, Econometrica, vol.74, issue.6, pp.1579-1601, 2006.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00719.x

C. Lucas and . Coffman, Intermediation reduces punishment (and reward) American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, pp.77-106, 2011.

V. P. Crawford and J. Sobel, Strategic Information Transmission, Econometrica, vol.50, issue.6, pp.1431-1451, 1982.
DOI : 10.2307/1913390

R. T. Croson, L. Terry, K. J. Boles, and . Murnighan, Cheap talk in bargaining experiments: lying and threats in ultimatum games, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.51, issue.2, pp.143-159, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00092-6

S. Erat, Avoiding lying: The case of delegated deception, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.93, pp.273-278, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.03.035

C. Fershtman and U. Gneezy, Strategic Delegation: An Experiment, The RAND Journal of Economics, vol.32, issue.2, pp.352-368, 2001.
DOI : 10.2307/2696414

J. R. Hamman, G. Loewenstein, and R. A. Weber, Self-Interest through Delegation: An Additional Rationale for the Principal-Agent Relationship, American Economic Review, vol.100, issue.4, pp.1826-1846, 2010.
DOI : 10.1257/aer.100.4.1826

B. Holström, On Incentives and Control in Organizations, 1977.

B. Holström, On the theory of delegation, Bayesian Models in Economic Theory, 1984.

S. Huck, W. Müller, and H. Normann, Strategic delegation in experimental markets, International Journal of Industrial Organization, vol.22, issue.4, pp.561-574, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2003.10.005

S. J. Grossman and O. D. Hart, An Analysis of the Principal-Agent Problem, Econometrica, vol.51, issue.1, pp.7-45, 1983.
DOI : 10.2307/1912246

W. Güth and M. G. Kocher, More than thirty years of ultimatum bargaining experiments: Motives, variations, and a survey of the recent literature, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.108, pp.2013-2048, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.06.006

W. Güth, R. Schmittberger, and B. Schwartze, An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.3, issue.4, pp.367-388, 1982.
DOI : 10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7

U. Gneezy, Deception: The Role of Consequences, American Economic Review, vol.95, issue.1, pp.384-394, 2005.
DOI : 10.1257/0002828053828662

N. Kartik, Strategic Communication with Lying Costs, Review of Economic Studies, vol.76, issue.4, pp.1359-1395, 2009.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00559.x

N. Kartik, M. Ottaviani, and F. Squintani, Credulity, lies, and costly talk, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.134, issue.1, pp.93-116, 2007.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jet.2006.04.003

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=

P. H. Kriss, R. Nagel, and R. A. Weber, Implicit vs. explicit deception in ultimatum games with incomplete information, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.93, pp.337-346, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jebo.2013.03.024

E. P. Lazear and S. Rosen, Rank-Order Tournaments as Optimum Labor Contracts, Journal of Political Economy, vol.89, issue.5, pp.841-864, 1981.
DOI : 10.1086/261010

T. Lundquist, T. Ellingsen, and E. Gribbe, The aversion to lying, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.70, issue.1-2, pp.1-2, 2009.
DOI : 10.1016/j.jebo.2009.02.010

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00674103

N. Mazar, . Amir, D. On, and . Ariely, The Dishonesty of Honest People: A Theory of Self-Concept Maintenance, Journal of Marketing Research, vol.45, issue.6, pp.633-644, 2008.
DOI : 10.1509/jmkr.45.6.633

R. Oexl and Z. J. Grossman, Shifting the blame to a powerless intermediary, Experimental Economics, vol.109, issue.2, pp.306-312, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/s10683-012-9335-7

. Oosterbeek, . Hessel, R. Sloof, and G. Van-de-kuilen, Cultural Differences in Ultimatum Game Experiments: Evidence from a Meta-Analysis, Experimental Economics, vol.7, issue.2, pp.171-188, 2004.
DOI : 10.1023/B:EXEC.0000026978.14316.74

M. Ottaviani and F. Squintani, Naive audience and communication bias, International Journal of Game Theory, vol.79, issue.1, pp.129-150, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/s00182-006-0054-1

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=

. Sánchez-pagés, An experimental study of truth-telling in a sender???receiver game, Games and Economic Behavior, vol.61, issue.1, pp.67-112, 2006.
DOI : 10.1016/j.geb.2006.10.014

A. Smith and J. R. Vreeland, The survival of political leaders and IMF programmes Globalization and the Nation State: The Impact of the IMF and the World Bank, pp.264-289, 2004.

M. Spence, Job Market Signaling, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.87, issue.3, pp.355-374, 1973.
DOI : 10.2307/1882010

URL : http://qje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/87/3/355

C. Vanberg, Why do people keep their promises? An experimental test of two explanations, Econometrica, vol.76, issue.6, pp.1467-1480, 2008.

J. R. Vreeland, The IMF: Lender of last resort or scapegoat?, Paper presented to the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, pp.14-17, 1999.