HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Preprints, Working Papers, ...

The value of lies in a power-to-take game with imperfect information

Abstract : Humans can lie strategically in order to leverage on their negotiation power. For instance, governments can claim that a "scapegoat" third party is responsible for reforms that impose higher costs on citizens, in order to make the pill sweeter. This paper analyzes such communication strategy within a variant of the ultimatum game. The first player gets an endowment, and the second player can impose a tax on it. The former can reject the allocation submitted by the tax-setter. A third party is then allowed to levy its own tax, and its intake is private information to the tax-setter. In a frameless experiment, 65% of the subjects in the tax-setter role overstate the tax levied by the third party in order to manipulate taxpayer's expectations and submit less advantageous offers; on average, for every additional currency unit of lie, measured by the gap between the claimed and the actual tax, they would reduce their offer by 0.43 currency units.
Document type :
Preprints, Working Papers, ...
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [25 references]  Display  Hide  Download

Contributor : Anne Crepin Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Monday, April 23, 2012 - 2:27:03 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, August 26, 2020 - 2:46:11 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Thursday, December 15, 2016 - 12:06:59 AM


Files produced by the author(s)


  • HAL Id : hal-00690409, version 1


Damien Besancenot, Delphine Dubart, Radu Vranceanu. The value of lies in a power-to-take game with imperfect information. 2012. ⟨hal-00690409⟩



Record views


Files downloads